View Full Version : GHG fullbody vs Bigfoots
gunner
03-05-2004, 10:35 AM
can somebody tell me if their really is a big diffrence in the look and size of the ghg fullbody compared to the bigfoots I've seen the pictures of the ghg and boy do they look awesome, but I've never seen them close up
JEDJR
03-05-2004, 12:04 PM
I can say the GHG's are lifesize and are more realistic looking. There are alot of sub species of Canadas.I find the Bigfoots are bigger than lifesize, but I am sure their are canadas that size, I just dont see em in Louisiana. :D I am sure someone else can be of more help when it comes to Canadas.
honkerbonker
03-05-2004, 01:52 PM
Bigfoots have always been and are still a great decoy. We've used them for a long time and killed a lot of geese with them. I also used GHGs this year and was very impressed. The first time I used them I had geese land with my GHG decoys instead of my Bigfoots. As far as size the GHG decoys are a little smaller, but are made to be lifesize. Like I said, Bigfoots are sill a really good decoy, but that's what they look like, a really good decoy. GHG decoys look like real geese. If you go the Greenhead Gear website and pull up the pictures of the goose decoys, most of the decoys show a picture of a real goose in the backround. I thinks it's pretty impressive how they copy the real thing. There's no better way to fool an animal than to duplicate nature. Having the foot bases that they do eliminates the robot look of some of the other decoys on the market, the paint schemes and texturing are awesome, there are a lot of options as far as poses go, and the flocked heads this year are going to kick ass. The real trick is trying to create a nutaral relaxed setting, and for my buck, nothing comes closer to the real thing than GHGs.
SwampHunter
03-05-2004, 04:15 PM
I have both and I would much rather have the Greenhead Gear fullbodies.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.